Intellectual freedom |Libraries and neutrality
by
Joseph Hanes | 09-01-17
I’ve always been a wordy sort of person. Yes, that too,
but I mean word-y. I was the sort of kid who spent time with a thesaurus
and dictionary as well as Tinkertoys and Matchbox cars. I was
fascinated by words, their uses, and shades of meaning.
Even my amateur lexicographic interest ill prepared me for a world in
which one of the more trenchant voices of political observation belongs
to the Merriam-Webster Twitter feed (
@MerriamWebster).
If you don’t follow it yet, do so immediately, for its largely
straightforward Word of the Day feature as well as its often wry and
acerbic commentary on trending lookups based on “conversations” of the
moment, not to mention words that aren’t really words (“covfefe”).
So the Webster’s dictionary has taken a side, or at least a
perspective. Based on what I know of Noah Webster’s own colorful history
and antipopulist views, I think he might approve. All of which puts an
intriguing gloss on an emerging discussion within our own profession on
what some may think a bedrock principle of librarianship: neutrality.
This discussion includes my fellow AL columnist
Meredith Farkas’s excellent piece on the critical librarianship movement (Jan./Feb., p. 70).
In one important sense, we aren’t neutral and never can be—nor should
we be. Naturally, each of us has his or her own biases, prejudices, and
preferences; we represent a sample of the breadth of society, so this
is inevitable and necessary to avoid homogeneity of thought and action.
Together, though, we advocate strongly on matters critical to our
success. We fight in public for the rights of our patrons to read and
think freely without fear of exposure, surveillance, or censure, as well
as for open and equal access to a range of materials. We stand for the
principle that government and public information shouldn’t depend on the
whims of the moment. We are engaged with, represent, and fight for our
communities and strive to improve them through our institutions and our
work.
Read more...
I want to be sure that we’re fighting the right fights on the right terms and, yes, using the right words.